"Not Now" Does Not Necessarily Mean "Not Ever": The Supreme Court's Refusal in Bennis v. Michigan to Abandon the "Guilty Property" Fiction of Forfeiture Law

Authors

Richard Henry Seamon, University of Idaho College of LawFollow

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1997

Recommended Citation

Richard H. Seamon, "Not Now" Does Not Necessarily Mean "Not Ever": The Supreme Court's Refusal in Bennis v. Michigan to Abandon the "Guilty Property" Fiction of Forfeiture Law, 48 S.D. L. REV. 389 (1997).